Back to Home

DraftPeer ...

Academic researchers constantly submit papers to journals, but receiving effective peer reviews is a slow and tedious process. Often, feedback isn’t thorough, or ...

manuscript reviewdraft feedbackpeer review platformacademic publishingresearch enhancement

Keyword Analysis

Primary Keyword: manuscript review

1 Year Volume

1,200

Growth

+30%

CPC

$2.75

Competition

MEDIUM

JanFebMarAprMayJunJulAugSepOctNovDec1,4081,0567043520

Keyword Summary

The primary keyword 'manuscript review' shows a moderate growth rate of 30% over the past year, with a stable monthly search volume peaking towards the end of the year. Despite being a niche keyword, it maintains medium competition and a CPC of $2.75, indicating reasonable advertiser interest. The market for manuscript review services appears to be growing, particularly with keywords like 'draft feedback' and 'peer review platform' showing significant growth, highlighting potential opportunities for platforms like DraftPeer.

Fastest Growing

  • draft feedback: 900 (+200%)
  • peer review platform: 800 (+150%)
  • academic publishing: 1,000 (+50%)
  • research enhancement: 650 (+100%)
  • academic manuscript: 750 (+75%)

Highest Volume

  • academic publishing: 1,000 (+50%)
  • manuscript editing: 950 (+10%)
  • peer review process: 900 (+25%)
  • draft feedback: 900 (+200%)
  • scientific manuscripts: 850 (+15%)

Most Relevant

  • draft feedback: 900 (+200%)
  • peer review platform: 800 (+150%)
  • manuscript evaluation: 700 (+50%)
  • journal submission tips: 600 (+-10%)
  • academic manuscript: 750 (+75%)

The Problem

Researchers face delays and insufficient feedback during the academic peer review process, which impacts the quality of their submissions and their career progression....

Unlock full content
Upgrade to Unlock

The Opportunity

There are over 2 million academic papers published annually, with many more submitted. The academic publishing industry is valued at over $10 billion, with researchers constantly looking for ways to i...

Unlock full content
Upgrade to Unlock

Feasibility

A scalable platform leveraging existing networks of academics can be built using current web technologies. The solution requires relatively simple interfaces for submission and review processes, makin...

Unlock full content
Upgrade to Unlock

Why Now?

With more researchers working remotely and the emphasis on rapid publication during events like the pandemic, the demand for quicker, more detailed feedback on research papers is growing....

Unlock full content
Upgrade to Unlock

Business Fit

The service targets academic researchers who need faster, higher-quality reviews of their manuscripts prior to journal submission. It's especially beneficial for early-career researchers trying to establish themselves and increase publication rates.

Proof

Academic forums such as ResearchGate and Academia.edu often have discussions related to the arduous peer review process. Rapid rise in preprint repositories shows researchers' appetite for speeding up the publication process.

Market Gap

Existing solutions like traditional journal-based reviews are slow and can be opaque. Preprint servers allow fast dissemination but don't provide feedback....

Unlock full content
Upgrade to Unlock

Execution Plan

Start by building out a basic platform that allows users to submit manuscripts and connect them with reviewers. Partner with academic societies and institutions to populate the reviewer network....

Unlock full content
Upgrade to Unlock

Idea Evaluation

Opportunity
...
Populating...
Problem
...
Populating...
Feasibility
...
Populating...
Why Now
...
Populating...

Business Fit

💰
Revenue Potential...

Populating...

⚙️
Execution Difficulty...

Populating...

🚀
Go-To-Market...

Populating...

Actions

Remove this idea from our public database and claim it exclusively as yours.

Claim This Idea

Unlock Full Potential

Upgrade to see chat with AI for idea expansion, marketing creative generator, content calendar, and ability to download all the data to get started.